About this IELTS Writing Template
Memorising complete essays is a poor strategy for the IELTS exam. Instead, learning the underlying framework of a high-scoring response allows you to adapt to any prompt. This Discussion Essay template for Task 2 demonstrates exactly how to structure your ideas, connect your paragraphs logically, and deploy appropriate vocabulary to achieve a Band 7.0–7.5. Use the paragraph-by-paragraph plan below as a skeleton for your next practice draft.
Paragraph-by-Paragraph Plan
Detailed sentence formulas
Introduction
Begin by introducing the topic in a general context, highlighting its relevance or importance in contemporary society. Use a sophisticated sentence structure to present the two opposing views clearly. For example, 'In today's rapidly evolving world, the debate surrounding [Topic] has garnered significant attention. While a faction of society contends that [Side A], others assert that [Side B].' Conclude the introduction by succinctly stating your own position, ensuring it is seamlessly integrated into the discussion. For instance, 'This essay will explore both perspectives before elucidating why I am inclined to support the latter view.'
Body Paragraph 1 (Side A)
Start with a topic sentence that clearly outlines the main argument for Side A. For example, 'Proponents of [Side A] argue that [Main Point].' Follow this with a detailed explanation, incorporating evidence or examples to substantiate the claim. For instance, 'This perspective is largely driven by [Detail], as evidenced by [Example].' Conclude the paragraph with a subtle critique of this viewpoint, paving the way for your own opinion. 'Nevertheless, this approach may inadvertently result in [Small Criticism].'
Body Paragraph 2 (Side B)
Begin with a topic sentence that introduces the main argument for Side B. 'Conversely, advocates of [Side B] posit that [Main Point].' Elaborate on this argument, providing robust evidence or examples. 'The primary advantage of this stance is [Detail], as illustrated by [Example].' Clearly align yourself with this perspective, explaining why it resonates with you. 'From my perspective, this approach is more viable because [Reason].'
Conclusion
Summarize the key points discussed in the essay, reiterating the strengths of both sides. 'In conclusion, although [Side A] offers certain benefits such as [Positive Aspect], I firmly believe that [Side B] provides more substantial long-term advantages due to [Summary of why].' End with a thought-provoking statement or a call to action that underscores the importance of the issue. 'Ultimately, the decision between these approaches will shape the future of [Topic], necessitating careful consideration by policymakers.'
Full Sample Response
Written by an expert IELTS examiner
People hold differing views regarding how to fund tertiary education. While some argue that universities should be completely free, others believe that students must cover the costs. This essay will discuss both perspectives before explaining why I favor the latter approach.
Those who advocate for free university education argue that it creates a perfectly equal society. This is primarily because it removes financial barriers, allowing talented youths from impoverished backgrounds to access elite careers. For example, Scandinavian countries provide free higher education, which significantly reduces the wealth gap. However, this approach may lead to exorbitant taxation, placing a heavy burden on the working middle class.
Conversely, others maintain that charging tuition fees is a superior approach. The main advantage is that it provides universities with the massive funding required to conduct cutting-edge research and hire top-tier professors. From my perspective, this is a more sustainable solution because it also makes students fiercely value their education. When individuals invest their own money into a degree, they are statistically less likely to drop out or miss classes. A good illustration of this is the competitive nature of American universities, where high tuition fees correspond to high graduation rates and global university rankings.
To summarize, while free education has its merits regarding social mobility, I believe that requiring students to pay tuition offers more significant long-term benefits because it maintains the high quality of institutions and fosters a serious academic work ethic.
Examiner Commentary
Why this response scores highly
The sample essay effectively achieves its target band of 7.0-7.5 by demonstrating a balanced analysis of the topic with a clear opinion. In terms of Task Response, the essay addresses both perspectives on the issue of funding tertiary education, providing relevant examples and a well-reasoned argument for the writer's preferred stance. The thesis statement is clear, and the conclusion effectively summarizes the main points while reinforcing the writer's opinion.
Regarding Coherence and Cohesion, the essay is well-organized, with each paragraph focusing on a distinct aspect of the discussion. The use of cohesive devices ensures a logical progression of ideas, making it easy for the reader to follow the argument. However, there is room for improvement in the variety and sophistication of linking phrases used.
In terms of Lexical Resource, the essay employs a range of vocabulary appropriate for the topic, though further lexical sophistication could enhance the essay's impact. The Grammatical Range and Accuracy are strong, with complex sentence structures used effectively throughout. Minor errors do not impede communication, but attention to detail could further elevate the essay's quality.
Related Templates
Opinion Essay
A straightforward, easy-to-remember structure that ensures you answer the prompt clearly without overcomplicating the grammar.
Opinion Essay
A balanced and logically flowing structure utilizing solid linking words and clear topic sentences to secure a Band 7.
Opinion Essay
A sophisticated analytical structure that concedes a minor counter-point before decisively proving your main argument with high-level vocabulary.