IELTS EvaluatorIELTSEvaluator
Get Started
Task 2AdvancedTarget: Band 8.5–9.0

Discussion Essay Template

A masterclass in neutrality and critical thinking, dissecting the philosophical merits of both sides before delivering a highly nuanced synthesis.

Back to Template Library

About this IELTS Writing Template

Memorising complete essays is a poor strategy for the IELTS exam. Instead, learning the underlying framework of a high-scoring response allows you to adapt to any prompt. This Discussion Essay template for Task 2 demonstrates exactly how to structure your ideas, connect your paragraphs logically, and deploy appropriate vocabulary to achieve a Band 8.5–9.0. Use the paragraph-by-paragraph plan below as a skeleton for your next practice draft.

Paragraph-by-Paragraph Plan

Detailed sentence formulas

1

Introduction

  1. Sentence 1: Begin with a broad statement about the topic to set the context. Use sophisticated language to immediately establish an academic tone.
  2. Sentence 2: Clearly introduce both sides of the argument. Use complex sentence structures to show linguistic proficiency.
  3. Sentence 3: State your thesis, indicating that you will evaluate both sides and present your nuanced opinion.
Example: "The discourse surrounding [Topic] is a perennial issue that continues to polarize opinion across various societal strata." Example: "One school of thought suggests [Side A], whereas an opposing perspective posits that [Side B]." Example: "This essay will critically evaluate both stances, ultimately arguing that [Your Nuanced Opinion]."
2

Body Paragraph 1 (Side A Analysis)

  1. Sentence 1: Introduce Side A with a complex sentence that outlines its main rationale.
  2. Sentence 2: Provide a detailed explanation or example to support Side A.
  3. Sentence 3: Introduce a sophisticated critique of Side A, using advanced vocabulary and sentence structures.
  4. Sentence 4: Conclude the paragraph by summarizing the limitations of Side A.
Example: "The rationale behind [Side A] is often rooted in the belief that [Complex Idea]." Example: "Proponents assert that [Detail], which ostensibly leads to [Outcome]." Example: "Nevertheless, this viewpoint, while theoretically sound, can be seen as [Sophisticated Critique] when applied practically." Example: "Thus, despite its theoretical appeal, the practical implications of [Side A] render it less viable."
3

Body Paragraph 2 (Side B Analysis)

  1. Sentence 1: Introduce Side B with a complex sentence that outlines its main rationale.
  2. Sentence 2: Provide a detailed explanation or example to support Side B.
  3. Sentence 3: Offer a compelling argument for why Side B is more persuasive, using advanced metaphors or abstract concepts.
  4. Sentence 4: Conclude the paragraph by reinforcing the strengths of Side B.
Example: "In contrast, the argument for [Side B] is grounded in [Abstract Concept]." Example: "This is particularly evident when considering [Example], which underscores [Point]." Example: "In my view, this perspective is far more compelling as it addresses the root problem of [Core Issue] rather than merely treating the symptoms." Example: "Therefore, the argument for [Side B] not only resolves immediate issues but also ensures long-term sustainability."
4

Conclusion

  1. Sentence 1: Summarize the main points of both sides, using complex sentence structures.
  2. Sentence 2: State your final judgment and propose a broader societal action.
  3. Sentence 3: End with a forward-looking statement that underscores the importance of the issue.
Example: "In conclusion, although the merits of [Side A] are non-negligible, the evidence suggesting [Side B] is far more persuasive." Example: "Moving forward, it is imperative that [Policy/Action] is adopted to maximize societal benefit." Example: "Ultimately, the resolution of this debate will significantly impact future societal progress."

Full Sample Response

Written by an expert IELTS examiner

The discourse surrounding the funding of tertiary education often polarizes public opinion. One school of thought suggests that universities should be universally free, whereas an opposing perspective posits that the financial burden must fall upon the students. This essay will critically evaluate both stances, ultimately arguing that a tuition-based system, supplemented by robust scholarships, is the most pragmatic approach.

The rationale behind free university education is often rooted in the belief that knowledge is a fundamental human right rather than a privileged commodity. Proponents assert that eliminating tuition fees entirely dismantles systemic inequality, granting marginalized demographics unprecedented access to upward mobility. Nevertheless, this viewpoint, while theoretically noble, can be seen as economically untenable when applied practically. Massive influxes of non-paying students inevitably strain institutional resources, forcing governments to aggressively hike income taxes to subsidize the educational sector.

In contrast, the argument for charging tuition fees is grounded in the preservation of academic excellence and institutional autonomy. This is particularly evident when considering the sprawling research facilities and elite faculties maintained by premium fee-charging universities. In my view, this perspective is far more compelling as it addresses the core issue of sustainable institutional growth. By requiring students to invest financially, universities secure the capital necessary to innovate, while simultaneously fostering a highly competitive, serious student body that values the educational product they are purchasing.

In conclusion, although the egalitarian merits of free education are non-negligible, the economic realism supporting tuition fees is far more persuasive. Moving forward, it is imperative that governments implement a hybrid system—charging tuition to fund excellence, while aggressively offering merit-based scholarships to protect equal opportunity.

Examiner Commentary

Why this response scores highly

The sample essay achieves its target band due to its exemplary performance across all four assessment criteria.

Task Response: The essay effectively addresses the task by presenting a clear position throughout, as required for a Band 9. The nuanced opinion is articulated with precision, and the hybrid solution proposed is both innovative and well-justified. Each paragraph is dedicated to a single, well-developed idea, ensuring that the response is fully extended and supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: The essay demonstrates a logical progression of ideas, with each paragraph seamlessly flowing into the next. Cohesive devices are used skillfully to link ideas within and between paragraphs, contributing to the overall coherence of the essay. The introduction and conclusion are particularly strong, framing the discussion effectively and providing a clear resolution.

Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is employed with precision and sophistication. The use of advanced terms and phrases enhances the academic tone of the essay, while synonyms and paraphrasing are used effectively to avoid repetition. This demonstrates a high level of lexical resource, characteristic of a Band 9 performance.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay showcases a variety of complex sentence structures, including compound and complex sentences, which are executed with a high degree of accuracy. There are no grammatical errors, and punctuation is used correctly throughout. This level of grammatical proficiency is indicative of a Band 9 essay.

Related Templates

Beginner

Opinion Essay

A straightforward, easy-to-remember structure that ensures you answer the prompt clearly without overcomplicating the grammar.

View Template
Intermediate

Opinion Essay

A balanced and logically flowing structure utilizing solid linking words and clear topic sentences to secure a Band 7.

View Template
Advanced

Opinion Essay

A sophisticated analytical structure that concedes a minor counter-point before decisively proving your main argument with high-level vocabulary.

View Template